In my last post I pointed out how Hertz pricing differed radically based on which web site you used.
Here's another example if weirdness relating to CDW/LDW:
Neither Thrifty nor Dollar will tell me how much CDW/LDW is in advance. Instead I'm expected to wait until I am at the counter before finding out. So I'm being asked to commit to a rental which could be up to US$30/day more expensive. Given the base rental rate is roughly that amount already it's a ridiculous thing to do. From my viewpoint it's not my money I'm spending and since I'm not in the habit of entering my employer into potentially unlimited spending commitments I think I'll pass. Note that www.dollar.com did the same thing when I checked.
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Rental Car Pricing Weirdness I ... Hertz likes Irish drivers...
Living in Ireland and thinking of renting a car in the US? It pays to shop around. Even when dealing with the same vendor.
I had to rent a car in Washington DC and was doing the rounds of the rental websites. I discovered this somewhat startling anomaly:
Depending on whether you use hertz.ie or hertz.com you will be offered different prices for the exact same rental.
Since this is more than a bit odd I have screenshots of both offers of a rental at Washington Dulles:
Using www.hertz.com I was offered US$2674.80:
And the same rental at www.hertz.ie was EUR1387.72:
Even assuming a back of the envelope exchange rate of 1.25 that's still only US$1734....
From what I can tell the issue is with the additional insurance(s) that I selected - CDW or LDW.
My guess is it works like this:
Note to People who know about this as opposed to having opinions: Am I right? If not, correct me!
So if you're Irish consider this: The next time you spend 8 hours on a plane into Dulles, get to the rental counter at around 2am Irish time, rent a car and trundle nervously out of the Hertz lot in your Buick Zipcode or whatever-the-hell-it-is-they-are-renting-this-week while simultaneously trying to disarm the radio which is stuck on something called the 'Kojo Nnamdi Show', get the mirrors to show something other than sky without opening the trunk (again), identify which of the 12 different Marriotts in your destination city you are actually staying in and find your driver's license for the dude at the exit consider this:
Hertz corporation regards you as a safer bet than a US driver who buys CDW....
I had to rent a car in Washington DC and was doing the rounds of the rental websites. I discovered this somewhat startling anomaly:
Depending on whether you use hertz.ie or hertz.com you will be offered different prices for the exact same rental.
Since this is more than a bit odd I have screenshots of both offers of a rental at Washington Dulles:
Using www.hertz.com I was offered US$2674.80:
And the same rental at www.hertz.ie was EUR1387.72:
Even assuming a back of the envelope exchange rate of 1.25 that's still only US$1734....
From what I can tell the issue is with the additional insurance(s) that I selected - CDW or LDW.
My guess is it works like this:
- Almost all US rentals are domestic. Www.hertz.com works on this assumption.
- US Drivers almost always insure rental cars on their own car insurance.
- Too rich to care (price insensitive)
- Don't own a car (A bit of a red flag from an automobile insurance viewpoint...)
- Don't pay attention (ditto)
Note to People who know about this as opposed to having opinions: Am I right? If not, correct me!
So if you're Irish consider this: The next time you spend 8 hours on a plane into Dulles, get to the rental counter at around 2am Irish time, rent a car and trundle nervously out of the Hertz lot in your Buick Zipcode or whatever-the-hell-it-is-they-are-renting-this-week while simultaneously trying to disarm the radio which is stuck on something called the 'Kojo Nnamdi Show', get the mirrors to show something other than sky without opening the trunk (again), identify which of the 12 different Marriotts in your destination city you are actually staying in and find your driver's license for the dude at the exit consider this:
Hertz corporation regards you as a safer bet than a US driver who buys CDW....
Friday, May 11, 2012
Rathgar's Runaway Reptiles...
"Floerentine", a local Tortoise attracted significant media attention after doing a runner from home. The Irish Times published my helpful idea:
Sir, – The owner’s of Rathgar’s runaway reptile (Home News, May 8th) could learn a lot from recent reports of a lost budgie in Tokyo that was returned to its owner because it had been trained to recite its entire address. While teaching Florentine to talk would probably be an insurmountable problem, his shell would still have plenty of space to write his full address. There may even be space left for sufficient postage to cover his return home. – Yours, etc, DAVID ROLFE, Leinster Road, Rathmines, Dublin 6.
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Dress Codes for Yokels...
Another Letter:
Sir, – According to a report in your newspaper, the European Parliament is currently focused on proposals that would require rural pedestrians to wear high-visbility jackets (Home News, September 29th). So at a time when the euro faces an existential crisis, our MEPs are busy drafting a dress code for yokels? That puts the emperor Nero in the halfpenny place. – Yours, etc,
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Reality TV: A solution for the Irish Presidency...
Had a letter in the IT:
Sir, – Given the clear difficulties in finding suitable candidates and the ongoing issue of funding the national broadcaster, should we not give consideration to a constitutional change that would allow the president to be the winner of a new reality television show called So You Want To Rule Ireland? Prospective presidential candidates would live as housemates in Áras an Uachtaráin and would be set collective tasks such as “Greet the new Japanese ambassador at the airport”. This would allow a much broader field of candidates and the unfortunate discovery of skeletons in cupboards, closets or underneath lonely beaches near Dundalk would lead to a ratings boost instead of an electoral crisis.
– Yours, etc,
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Dubious Data Practices...
According to this doc from the Data Protection Commissioner the Irish Insurance Federation uses a fairly strange definition of 'you' when deciding whether to give 'you' insurance or not. They have a database which to my mind has a fairly serious design flaw:
So If my name is "MICHAEL GOLDSMITH" and I share a birthday with a deeply unhealthy "MICKEY GOLDSTEIN " I can be turned down for life insurance because of him or his policy history. Not only that, if I make a data protection act request I will be given his information....
The really bizarre thing is that the Data Protection commissioner is aware of this but doesn't seem to find it odd...
The entry in the Registry comprises the first three letters of the applicant's surname, the first five letters of the first name, the date of birth, together with the date and codes for the relevant insurer and the type of policy.
So If my name is "MICHAEL GOLDSMITH" and I share a birthday with a deeply unhealthy "MICKEY GOLDSTEIN " I can be turned down for life insurance because of him or his policy history. Not only that, if I make a data protection act request I will be given his information....
The really bizarre thing is that the Data Protection commissioner is aware of this but doesn't seem to find it odd...
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Morgan Kelly and his proposal to default
Sent the following to the Irish Times. Didn't get published. Ho hum...
Madam,
The Irish State was founded by a group of individuals who believed in demonstrating the reality of Independence by throwing the new nation into a ruinous trade war with Britain and its empire. A happy willingness to antagonize its neighbours and harm its own interests simply to prove the fact of Irish independence continued for more than half a century, with mixed results for people who lived here.
Ireland now appears to have gone to the other extreme and is busy sacrificing the nation to avoid upsetting anyone in Europe. Let us not make the mistake of assuming that our selflessness will be reciprocated by France or Germany, both of whom promoted the concept of the Euro, insisted that their nationals had critical positions in the running of it and are now blaming the users of their currency for the for the terminal problems it now faces.
The government needs to make a conscious shift back towards the self-centred politics of the thirties and forties. At an absolute minimum the it should start publicly making contingency plans to implement the "Kelly Option" and other equally radical scenarios such as approaching the United States and asking to join if a catastrophic loss of sovereignty becomes inevitable. Such plans do not have to be put into action to provide benefits. Their mere existence will strengthen our position and turn us from supplicants into participants in the current process.
David Rolfe
Madam,
The Irish State was founded by a group of individuals who believed in demonstrating the reality of Independence by throwing the new nation into a ruinous trade war with Britain and its empire. A happy willingness to antagonize its neighbours and harm its own interests simply to prove the fact of Irish independence continued for more than half a century, with mixed results for people who lived here.
Ireland now appears to have gone to the other extreme and is busy sacrificing the nation to avoid upsetting anyone in Europe. Let us not make the mistake of assuming that our selflessness will be reciprocated by France or Germany, both of whom promoted the concept of the Euro, insisted that their nationals had critical positions in the running of it and are now blaming the users of their currency for the for the terminal problems it now faces.
The government needs to make a conscious shift back towards the self-centred politics of the thirties and forties. At an absolute minimum the it should start publicly making contingency plans to implement the "Kelly Option" and other equally radical scenarios such as approaching the United States and asking to join if a catastrophic loss of sovereignty becomes inevitable. Such plans do not have to be put into action to provide benefits. Their mere existence will strengthen our position and turn us from supplicants into participants in the current process.
David Rolfe
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


