Kevin Myers has an opinion piece in the Indo today in which he says "
Everything people believed about Hitler's intentions toward Britain was a myth created by Churchill". I personallty think he's got what it was possible for Hitler to decide to do and what was actually likely to work mixed up, as I said in this comment:
The more-or-less unarguable fact that Hitler's invasion plan for
Britain was deeply flawed needs to be considered in the context of the
level of authority Hitler had and the way he made decisions. The first
thing is that nobody had the authority to override Hitler and very few
were willing to even question his decisions. So the opinons of the
senior military lesders within Nazi germany were only relevent to their
own careers, and not to the decisions of the Fuhrer.
The second thing is that Hitler had repeatedly succeeded with moves
that were successful because they were so unexpected - common sense and
orthodoxy ruled out trying to move his army through the ardennes so when he
did it he took the entire world by surprise. Over time it would become
apparent that Hitler was far from a genious, but in 1940 this had not
become obvious.
As a result Hitler had developed an undeserved reputation as a
strategic genius, which meant that invasion paranoia was an entirely
rational response, especially when you have aerial photos showing the
preperations for an invasion.
Had Hitler given the order to invade history would have changed - if
Britain had succumbed he would have been free to turn his hand to
Russia until the completion of both the Manhatten project and ultra long
range the B36 bomber by 1947 created existential problems for his
regime.
The the other possible - and far more likely outcome - would have
been a failure of the invasion, which would have in turn raised
questions about the wisdom on taking on Russia that even his own
generals might have been unable to ignore
No comments:
Post a Comment